查看: 5189|回復: 9

中大豬有使用酸化劑的經濟效益嗎?

[複製鏈接]
總帖子數排名︰1

升級   100%

發表於 2011-4-2 18:31:01 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
假設每公斤 100 元以內的酸化劑 ∼ 使用在中大豬,您認為有其經濟效益嗎???
單選投票, 共有 49 人參與投票
36.73% (18)
63.27% (31)
您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
總帖子數排名︰5

升級   0%

發表於 2011-4-2 20:21:23 | 顯示全部樓層
大人吃壞肚子時
吃一些表飛鳴或鎮露丸
有些大人會因為缺乳糖酶而下痢,但那是特異體質
回復

使用道具 舉報

升級   46.68%

發表於 2011-4-2 22:43:44 | 顯示全部樓層
不算藥品
算是保健...........
回復

使用道具 舉報

升級   27.79%

發表於 2011-8-16 10:04:17 | 顯示全部樓層
就像老头吃钙片。你说有必要么?
回復

使用道具 舉報

總帖子數排名︰5

升級   0%

發表於 2013-7-30 07:39:07 | 顯示全部樓層
那要看你說的酸化劑的定義,題目要問得清楚
有的人的酸化劑指的是
甲酸及丙酸;一個是殺鰴菌(甲酸及丙酸)及沙門氏菌(甲酸)等飼料中有害菌.
有沒有效?那就看飼料原料品質及貯存條件
有機酸(短鏈脂妨酸如:乳酸,檸檬酸及琥珀酸(丁烯二酸)等)及磷酸
有沒有效?那看價格,短鏈脂肪酸在中大豬只有供應能量的功用.能量的價格是和玉米粉比的,合不合算,自己算一算就知道了
至於磷酸的部份就和你的二磷比一比
這樣就很清楚了嗎?

不必相爭
算一算,數字會說話
多用數字,現場就不必爭得面紅耳赤
回復

使用道具 舉報

總帖子數排名︰5

升級   0%

發表於 2013-7-30 12:45:49 | 顯示全部樓層
swineexpert 發表於 2013-7-29 21:20
添加劑的公司有沒有人得罪你??  小王關心您, 所以低調的偷偷的問你:準備好搬家了嗎??  小王每次都把話盡 ...

廠商知道我沒有污名化他們的產品
養豬戶自己判斷

做生意就正當做生意
沒有那麼大的產值就縮編人力,把人力放在最有生產力的地方,不要放在欺騙弱勢農民身上

前年有廠商找我到他們公司做傳功長老
我很明白直接地把他們的產品做了分析
告訢他們那些產品很有臨床價值,那些產品乾脆下架算了

去年我也在群英網上向大家說明
有一家公司合併後,為了衝沒有用的APP疫苗的業績,向有的農民說他們原有的APP疫苗(類毒素次單位疫苗)缺貨.
為了衝APP疫苗(類毒素次單位疫苗),沒有APP的場也讓獸醫師去解剖後賣APP疫苗

臺灣的畜產業犠牲了三四十年,也沒培養出一家像樣的國產動物藥品公司
外商逐步在臺縮編成貿易公司,國內廠商四分五裂都是小規模
主管機關設置了多家動物診斷中心
即然這樣培植不了全球或全亞洲的動物保健產業(荷蘭,以色列)
為什麼不走生產動物產業疫病清除的路線,至少提升生產動物產業(日本,丹麥)
全世界先進國家都在走疫病清除的生產動物產業
臺灣的生產動物產業也應該好好想想
產業的發展方向了
回復

使用道具 舉報

總帖子數排名︰5

升級   0%

發表於 2013-7-31 10:26:51 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 蘇少儀 於 2013-7-30 20:31 編輯

營養性酸化劑是應用在高蛋白(高鹼性飼料原料;黃豆粉,魚粉),高鈣及低乳製品的教槽,哺仔及仔豬配方而該一階段豬隻胃酸分泌能力尚未完全成熟
現在配方科技及飼料原料的選擇似乎都已克服這些問題..................
回復

使用道具 舉報

總帖子數排名︰5

升級   0%

發表於 2013-7-31 22:29:36 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 蘇少儀 於 2013-7-31 08:32 編輯

Acidifiers
Jay Y. Jacela, DVM; Joel M. DeRouchey, PhD; Mike D. Tokach, PhD; Robert D. Goodband, PhD; Jim L. Nelssen, PhD; David G. Renter, DVM, PhD; Steve S. Dritz, DVM, PhD

JYJ, DGR, SSD: Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas. JMD, MDT, RDG, JLN: Department of Animal Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas. Corresponding author: Dr Jay Y. Jacela, I-102 Mosier Hall, 1800 Denison Ave, Manhattan, KS 66506; Tel: 785-532-4845; E-mail: jjacela@vet.ksu.edu.

RIS citationCite as: Jacela JY, DeRouchey JM, Tokach MD, et al. Feed additives for swine: Fact sheets – acidifiers and antibiotics. J Swine Health Prod. 2009;17(5):270–275.  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fast facts

Acidifiers used in pig diets may be in organic or inorganic forms.
Acidifiers appear to be most effective in newly weaned pigs and in less complex nursery diets.
Growth-promoting effects of acidifiers in pig diets need to be further investigated to be justified as suitable replacements for antimicrobials.
Beneficial claims from dietary inclusions of acidifiers include control of bacterial growth in feed, increased growth performance, improvement in nutrient digestibility, and control of harmful bacteria in the gut.

What are acidifiers?
Acidifiers are compounds that have acidic properties: they may be organic or inorganic acids. Organic acids that have shown positive effects on growth performance in weaned pigs include citric, formic, fumaric, and propionic acids. In studies involving inorganic acids,1-3 positive growth responses have been reported with the use of phosphoric acid. However, research evaluating other inorganic acids, such as sulfuric acid, reported negative growth performance.4 Thus, phosphoric acid is the most commonly utilized inorganic acid in swine diets.

Inorganic acids are usually less costly than organic acids. Organic and inorganic acid combinations are often used in commercially available acidifiers. The response to mixed acids is generally better than to single acids,5 apparently due to dissociation properties of these acids at various locations in the pig’s digestive tract.

What are the benefits of using acidifiers?

A recent report2 summarizing several studies on acidifiers indicated that, in general, they appear to improve pig growth performance. However, the magnitude and consistency of the response may vary, depending on inclusion rate and other dietary factors. The exact mode of action of acidifiers has not been fully elucidated. However, acidifiers are commonly marketed as growth-promoting products and as alternatives for in-feed antibiotics. Unfortunately, due to the lack of consistent results, use of acidifiers to replace antibiotic growth promoters is still not justified. Acidifiers are believed to enhance growth by improving gut health through reduction of pH and buffering capacity of diets, improvement of pancreatic secretions that increase nutrient digestibility, or promotion of beneficial bacterial growth while inhibiting growth of pathogenic microbes.2,6 There is limited data indicating that acidifiers can act synergistically with phytase to improve phosphorus and magnesium digestibility.7,8

What factors affect the response to acidifiers?

Research suggests that age of pigs can affect the response to acidifiers, with newly weaned pigs showing the greatest response.4,9 Acidifiers are most beneficial during the first few days after weaning. The stomach of a weaned pig is not yet physiologically mature and may not be able to secrete a sufficient amount of acid to aid in digestion of solid food or inhibit proliferation of detrimental bacteria. However, the exact mechanism of the response to acidifiers is not clear.

Diet composition also may affect the response to acidifiers. It appears that greater responses are seen when simple diets are fed rather than complex diets containing milk products.10 This is presumably due to conversion of lactose from the milk products to lactic acid by Lactobacillus species in the stomach, thus creating an acidic environment and reducing the need for dietary supplementation with acidifiers.

Disadvantages of acidifiers

Corrosiveness, one disadvantage of using some acidifiers, may pose handling and equipment issues to the feed manufacturer. Salts of organic acids are generally odourless and less corrosive than their acid forms, making them easier to handle in the feed manufacturing process. Acidifiers may negatively affect diet palatability when added at excessive levels, resulting in lower feed intake. There may also be legal restrictions with the use of some acids. For example, pure formic acid is not legal for use in the United States, but salts of formic acid are available for use in feeds.

Summary

Acidifiers added to pig diets may potentially help improve growth performance by improving digestive processes through several mechanisms. However, a clear mode of action has yet to be described. The use of acidifiers appears to be most beneficial in the early period after weaning. Thus, acidifier use is typically limited to diets for pigs weighing less than 6.75 kg (15 lb).
回復

使用道具 舉報

總帖子數排名︰5

升級   0%

發表於 2013-7-31 22:35:27 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 蘇少儀 於 2013-7-31 17:02 編輯

酸化劑的應用一般在豬隻離乳後六週以內的日糧中價格效益比最顯著!!!
回復

使用道具 舉報

總帖子數排名︰93

升級   72.9%

發表於 2013-8-30 16:17:38 | 顯示全部樓層
蘇少儀 發表於 2013-7-31 22:35
酸化劑的應用一般在豬隻離乳後六週以內的日糧中價格效益比最顯著!!!

幫助是一定有,但是經濟效益則難
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

本版積分規則

手機版|Archiver| 台灣群英養豬網

Copyright © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表