台灣豬瘟打法?

蘇少儀 · 發表於 2011-11-13 21:37:32

本帖最後由蘇少儀於 2011-11-14 02:12 編輯

阿燦可以拿這個歐盟正式網頁內容給公司
向總公司轉達，別拿台灣做試驗...............................
台灣的產官學研也可以做一下參考．
別人已經說不行的路就別往裡面走.......................

CSFV_goDIVA
Project Background
The economic and socio-economic impact of CSF is very high worldwide, including the territories of the EU. In 1993 and 1994, 10.7 and 21.4 million Euros respectively were spent on outbreaks in Belgium and Germany, with a further 130 million Euros of market support in 1994. In 1997, an epizootic outbreak centred in The Netherlands resulted in the compulsory slaughter and disposal of more than 10 million pigs, with costs estimated at over one billion Euros. An estimation of the overall economic loss results in several times these amounts. However, the situation is dynamic and also very recently (2006) more than 120000 pigs had to be culled in Germany due to a small outbreak of CSFV in domestic pigs.
Eradication of CSF in domestic pigs has been achieved in several areas within the EU. However, despite intensive efforts on national as well as on international level, the complete eradication of CSF in Europe has proved to be elusive. Additionally, the disease is still endemic in some new EU member states (Romania and Bulgaria) and sporadic outbreaks still occur in free areas. The latter is most likely due to the persistence of the virus in wild boar populations, which acts as a reservoir for the virus. Furthermore, population dynamics in back yard pigs is not fully understood, as this type of pig holdings is new to the European Community and hasn't been fully investigated. As a consequence, there is a strong need for improvement of knowledge and intervention strategies for back yard pigs.
Currently a non-vaccination policy exists in the EU. However, due to the problems in wild boar and in domestic pigs in some member states derogations of this non-vaccination policy and some field trials are ongoing. In case of oral vaccinations in wild boar, the live C-strain vaccine is used, since only live vaccines can be used for oral vaccination. The disadvantage of this vaccine is that no differentiation between vaccinated and infected animals can be made. In Romania and Bulgaria some herds are vaccinated with the registered marker vaccine based on a baculovirus produced E2 subunit vaccine. As this use of the E2 marker vaccine is new, some very valuable information on the field use of this vaccine could be made available from these countries. Nevertheless, some experimental studies demonstrated that the licensed E2-subunit marker vaccines are not efficacious enough for use as emergency vaccines in domestic pigs, and in addition can not be used in bait vaccines for oral immunization of wild boar. Controlling CSFV outbreaks in domestic pigs as well as in wild boar and back yard herds would be significantly enhanced, if a safe and efficient live marker vaccine would be available with its accompanying DIVA assays.

貴哥 · 發表於 2011-11-13 23:35:34

即便不行.......還是得硬這頭皮....一魯到底.......
老虎LP也畫了,超高利潤在眼前....任誰也無法放棄
光看代工廠商的水準.......就令人感到不踏實

蘇少儀 · 發表於 2011-11-15 08:56:05

本帖最後由蘇少儀於 2011-11-15 08:57 編輯

對廠商我沒意見（說來也許荒唐，有些廠商不知道自己的產品好在那裡或.............在那裡）
但應該引進對產業正向發展有助益的產品及觀念才是產業務業應持的態度

半瓶水 · 發表於 2011-11-15 14:47:21

請問如果有打疫苗但被檢測為陽性場會被卡擦嗎

蘇少儀 · 發表於 2011-11-16 08:37:11

要先看相關"辦法"會不會得到共識

蘇少儀 · 發表於 2011-11-16 10:16:07

本帖最後由蘇少儀於 2011-11-16 10:21 編輯

”快過期的疫苗, 不是官商合作, 不然是什麼??”

飯可以隨便吃，話可不能隨便講．另外，就算這樣，只要符合採購"辦法"，就合法．
所以"辦法"取得共識很重要

很多大養豬場，大歸大，有很多是藥商股東的，用藥給小場看的．或許也是產業組織中的理監事或什麼理事長的
"辦法"是誰訂的.................偉臣啊！！！要學著玩啊...............

其實真得要做這些事啊！！！臺灣畜產及獸醫界的水準是夠的．但成功後，你看一下，有那些產業及廠商一年的所得要從何而來啊？有很多員工要養啊！.................偉臣啊！！！要學著玩啊...............